Many commercially available small wind turbines with plastic blades and steel towers are infamous for their low reliability, high embodied energy, and limited power output. Building them out of wood can addresses these issues.
Because of their aesthetic appeal, and thanks to the ability to produce them locally, small wooden wind turbines can also improve the public acceptance of wind power. Furthermore, innovation in tower design facilitates the installation of small wind turbines, reducing the need for concrete foundations and heavy machinery.
Tests have shown that many commercially available small wind turbines may not always generate sufficient power over their lifetime to compensate for the energy that was needed to produce them.
There are three reasons why this is so. First, there are the laws of physics. The energy yield of a wind turbine increases faster than its height and rotor size, meaning that as a wind turbine becomes smaller, its power output decreases over proportionally.
Second, wind turbine blades are commonly made from fiberglass reinforced plastic, which is energy-intensive to produce (and impossible to recycle). This energy needs to be “paid back” during the lifetime of the wind turbine, which can be challenging for machines with small rotor diameters.
Third, the maintenance of small wind turbines depends on the ability of the manufacturer to remain in business and provide its customers with spare parts. Unlike solar panels, wind turbines have a lot of moving parts and are thus more likely to need repairs. However, suppliers of small wind turbines tend to have an even shorter life expectancy than their products. 1
Hand Carved Wood Blades
The laws of physics can’t be changed, but on their own they don’t make small wind turbines uneconomical and unsustainable. It’s the other two factors that are decisive, and these can be addressed. In fact, they have been addressed for more than two decades by Scottish engineer Hugh Piggott, who builds small 1-2 kW wind turbines with 2-4 meter rotor diameters using solid wooden blades. 2
The blades are hand carved locally with basic woodworking skills and tools. In contrast to fiberglass blades, little or no energy is used to produce them. This increases the chance that the wind turbine will produce more energy over its lifetime than was needed to make it.
Defying the usual focus on efficiency, Piggott’s wind turbines sacrifice peak power for more reliable operation. The machines use a furling system which limits the turbine input at winds of 8 m/s (Beaufort 5), while most commercial models keep working up to higher wind speeds. This increases reliability, because the faster the machine spins, the quicker its parts will wear out. 3
A comparison of Piggott’s wind turbines with commercially available models concluded that the increased energy yield generated by the latter at wind speeds above 8 m/s is largely wasted, because most of the extra power is generated when the batteries are already full. The study also revealed that Piggott’s design is about 20% cheaper, taking into account both capital and operational costs. 3
Piggott’s open source design has spawned thousands of small DIY wind turbines all over the world. It also became the basis for several wind-based rural electrification initiatives in Mongolia, Nepal, Peru and Nicaragua. 4567 In “developing” countries, the ability to manufacture and maintain the turbines locally is a great advantage over the use of commercial wind turbines or solar panels.
Commercial Wind Turbines with Wood Blades
The use of solid wood blades, once common for smaller windmills and wind turbines, has seen renewed interest lately. 89 Most notable is the success story of the Dutch company EAZ Wind, founded in 2014 by four young windsurfers. The firm, which now has over 40 employees, sells wind turbines with solid wooden blades to farms and energy cooperatives in the region. With a rotor diameter of 12 meter and a power output of 10 kW, the turbines are about five times larger than Piggott’s machines.
The blades are made from solid wood beams that are glued together and then sanded to obtain their shape. They are then covered with an epoxy coating to protect them from humidity, while the sharp side of the blade gets a strip of fiberglass reinforced plastic to make it more durable. According to the manufacturer, the wind turbines — installed on 15 m tall towers — produce roughly 30,000 kWh of electricity per year, which corresponds to the power use of ten Dutch households. A machine sells for 46,000 euro, which makes it cheaper than a solar PV system (4,600 euro per household, or less than half the price of a solar PV system). The financial payback time – in the windy northern Netherlands – is 7 to 10 years.
Interestingly, EAZ Wind’s choice for wooden blades is not driven by the aim to lower the embodied energy of the wind turbine. Rather, the company’s mission is to make the countryside – especially farms but also small villages – self-sufficient in terms of power production by designing more beautiful and locally produced wind turbines that people don’t complain about. As in many other countries, large wind turbines – and the transmission lines that go with them – raise a lot of opposition from local residents in the Netherlands.
The approach seems to work. When a farm installs a wind turbine, its neighbours are usually the next customers. EAZ Wind has sold more than 400 wind turbines by now. Public acceptance of wind power seems to be encouraged by two factors. First, wind turbines with wooden blades have a more natural look, increasing their aesthetic appeal. Second, the machines are produced locally, meaning that the purchase of a wind turbine supports the local economy. The wood for the blades comes from a nearby province and is processed by companies in the region.
The turbins from EAZ Wind have wooden blades, but steel towers. The Swedish company InnoVentum takes a different approach: its wind turbines have a wooden tower, while the blades are made from plastic. The 12 m or 20 m tall towers are of a unique design, composed from small wood modules that can be bolted together on the ground in a few hours.
The multi-leg towers require no or much less concrete for their foundations and they can be erected without the use of a crane, using a rope and a winch instead. Around fifteen have been installed since 2012. Like EAZ Wind, the company aims to create a new aesthetic level that may help to increase the acceptance of wind turbines.
Of course both approaches could be combined, resulting in small wind turbines with wooden blades, tower and other structural parts. A small wind turbine that’s almost completely built out of wood – minus the gearwork and the generator – further decreases the energy that’s needed to produce it, thus making it more economical and sustainable over its entire lifetime. In terms of carbon emissions, a small wooden wind turbine can even be considered a carbon sink, because the wood sequesters CO2 that the trees have taken from the atmosphere.
Combining Wind and Solar
The newest products from both EAZ Wind and InnoVentum incorporate solar panels at the basis of the structure. Because the wind turbine and the solar PV system can share the same support structure, electrical system, and energy storage, this approach saves money and resources. The combination of solar and wind also increases the chances of sufficient power output at any time, reducing the need for energy storage – which is the most unsustainable part of an off-the-grid power installation.
In the hybrid solar-wind model from EAZ Wind, the capacity of the wind turbine is double the capacity of the solar PV panels, reflecting the local climate (windy but not very sunny). The addition of solar panels increases the power yield to 45,000 kWh per year, which corresponds to the power demand of 14 Dutch households. However, the use of solar panels increases the embodied energy of the system considerably, so that it may no longer be a carbon sink.
Decentralised Power Production
Small wooden wind turbines offer additional benefits that are inherent to all decentralised power sources. The fact that they’re paid for by the same people that enjoy their benefits, increases their public acceptance. They also eliminate the need for transmission lines, and the more power is produced and used locally, the less challenging it becomes to integrate unpredictable wind power into the central grid. Last but not least, the connection between energy use and demand encourages lower energy ways of life.
Kris De Decker
To make a comment, please send an e-mail to solar (at) lowtechmagazine (dot) com.
Kostakis, Vasilis, et al. “The convergence of digital commons with local manufacturing from a degrowth perspective: two illustrative cases.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197 (2018): 1684-1693. https://www.minasliarokapis.com/CleanerProduction2016_Kostakis_DigitalCommonsLocalManufacturing.pdf ↩
How to build a wind turbine. High Piggott, 2003. https://www.scoraigwind.com/pirate%20oldies/Hugh%20Piggott%20Axial-flow%20PMG%20wind%20turbine%20May%202003.pdf ↩
Sumanik-Leary, Jon, et al. “Locally manufactured small wind turbines: how do they compare to commercial machines.” Proceedings of 9 th PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe. 2013. http://windempowerment.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/PhD_Seminar_2013_FullPaper_Sumanik-Leary-FINAL.pdf ↩↩
Mishnaevsky, Leon, et al. “Materials for wind turbine blades: an overview.” Materials 10.11 (2017): 1285. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/11/1285 ↩
Mishnaevsky Jr, Leon, et al. “Strength and reliability of wood for the components of low-cost wind turbines: computational and experimental analysis and applications.” Wind Engineering 33.2 (2009): 183-196. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hai_Qing2/publication/242770543_Strength_and_Reliability_of_Wood_for_the_Components_of_Low-cost_Wind_Turbines_Computational_and_Experimental_Analysis_and_Applications/links/590142fa0f7e9bcf65468690/Strength-and-Reliability-of-Wood-for-the-Components-of-Low-cost-Wind-Turbines-Computational-and-Experimental-Analysis-and-Applications.pdf ↩↩↩
Mishnaevsky Jr, Leon, et al. “Small wind turbines with timber blades for developing countries: Materials choice, development, installation and experiences.” Renewable Energy 36.8 (2011): 2128-2138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148111000565 ↩
Sinha, Rakesh, et al. “Selection of Nepalese timber for small wind turbine blade construction.” Wind Engineering 34.3 (2010): 263-276. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0309-524X.34.3.263 ↩
Clausen, P. D., F. Reynal, and D. H. Wood. “Design, manufacture and testing of small wind turbine blades.” Advances in wind turbine blade design and materials. Woodhead Publishing, 2013. 413-431. ↩
Pourrajabian, Abolfazl, et al. “Choosing an appropriate timber for a small wind turbine blade: A comparative study.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 100 (2019): 1-8. ↩